Search for: "Jack V Watts"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2017, 5:00 pm
” Watts v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm
On that note, Ken recommended a paper by Michael Schmitt and Sean Watts about international humanitarian law and opinio juris. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:56 pm
Last week we mentioned the decision in Watts v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:28 am
Brooks et al v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 11:38 am
Instead of reading the boys’ story in terms of descent from clothing to nakedness, Watt reads it in terms of the constancy of dress. [read post]
7 May 2016, 7:32 am
Laura Donohue commented on the public v. private collection debate and observed that in the end, it all comes down to power. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 5:24 am
And Jack Goldsmith collated the plethora of opinions on whether the president actually has the power to pardon himself. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 6:55 am
Jack flagged Sean’s case note in the Harvard Law Review supporting the Second Circuit’s post-Kiobel decision (although not its reasoning) in Balintulo v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:31 pm
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
This model prosecution memorandum (or “pros memo”) assesses federal charges Special Counsel Jack Smith may bring against former President Donald Trump for alleged criminal interference in the 2020 election. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
(Thanks to our local counsel Donald Screen, also at Chandra Law, and law students Jack Maib, Malek Khawam, and Brian Asquith, who worked on the memorandum. [read post]
9 May 2017, 10:56 am
Lawfare liveblogged both yesterday’s oral argument in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 8:04 am
On Friday, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), after four years of litigation, shifted its strategy in its banner NSA case, Jewel v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
The ongoing trial of Christopher Aitken, Martin Hockridge, Djazia Chaib-Eddour, Alexander Peat, and Gary Purnell, who deny using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour with intent to cause harassment, alarm or distress against BBC journalist Nicholas Watt during an anti-lockdown protest is covered by the Press Gazette here and here. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
Watts v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
Watts v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:23 am
That would be Reg’s Jack Russell. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
In evaluating whether the speaker acted with an intent to terrorize or intimidate, evidentiary weight should be given to contextual circumstances such as those referenced in Watts v. [read post]
